🚀 New bilingual website. Feedback welcome!

Hi everyone,

I’ve just finished a new website built entirely with :sparkles: Sitely and would really appreciate your feedback.

It’s a fairly large bilingual website (German & English) with around 100 pages, so there was quite a lot to build and keep consistent across both languages.

One thing I’m still struggling with is Montserrat. As many of you probably know, it can render slightly narrower on some mobile devices, which changes line breaks and spacing. If anyone has found a good workaround for this in Sitely, I’d really appreciate your advice.

Thanks in advance for taking the time to have a look!

Firstly, I should say that I don’t generally critique other people’s websites on forums like this. Design is always subjective, and every project has its own objectives, constraints and audience. However, in this case I can see that an enormous amount of thought, time and effort has gone into building this site, and I genuinely think that with a few relatively modest refinements you could significantly increase its effectiveness without losing the work you’ve already invested. So, my critique is based on how I would advise a client who approaches me for an opinion on how the site can be made more effective.

From a technical perspective, you’ve done a very good job. The site feels solid, professional and well organised, particularly considering its size and the challenge of maintaining two languages across around 100 pages. Navigation is logical, branding is consistent, and the overall quality of the build is evident.

Rather than focusing on typography (although hopefully someone else can help with the Montserrat rendering issue), I’d like to comment on something I think could have an even greater impact: the way the homepage communicates with first-time visitors.

At the moment, the homepage tells me who the company is and what the company does, but it doesn’t immediately communicate why I should choose the company over another advisory firm. Modern visitors tend to make surprisingly quick judgements, so the opening section has a huge influence on whether they continue exploring the site.

Personally, I think the homepage could work much harder by establishing a stronger visual hierarchy. The content is already there - it simply needs to be presented in a way that guides the visitor through the page more naturally. Larger statements, more breathing space, clearer section breaks, stronger calls to action and a little more visual rhythm would make the experience feel more engaging without changing the company’s identity.

I also found that much of the excellent content is presented in fairly wide, dense blocks of text. That’s understandable for a professional advisory business, but today’s users generally scan rather than read. Breaking information into shorter sections with stronger headings, icons, statistics, highlighted key points or simple diagrams would make the same information much easier to absorb.

Another opportunity is to introduce more evidence earlier in the journey. Client success stories, measurable outcomes, recognisable client logos, testimonials and perhaps a little more emphasis on the people behind the business would all help build trust much more quickly.

One thing I wouldn’t recommend is a complete redesign. In fact, I think that would be a mistake. The site already has a professional corporate identity that suits the business well. My suggestion would simply be to evolve it rather than reinvent it.

To illustrate what I mean, I’ve attached two quick concept mock-ups based on your existing content structure.

The first keeps very much to your current colour palette and branding, but reorganises the homepage with a stronger visual hierarchy and a more modern content flow. It demonstrates that relatively small layout changes can make the page feel more open, easier to scan and more focused on guiding visitors towards making contact.

The second uses exactly the same content structure but adopts a darker visual treatment. I don’t necessarily think it’s better - it’s simply a different design direction that creates a stronger visual impact. Some people will naturally prefer the lighter approach, while others will find the darker version more premium or memorable. Neither is right or wrong; they’re simply different interpretations of the same underlying structure.

For me, that’s really the key point. The discussion isn’t primarily about colour - it’s about communication. The homepage should be designed first and foremost around the impression you want visitors to form within those first few seconds and the actions you want them to take next.

Overall, I think you’ve produced an excellent piece of work, particularly given the scale of the project. My comments are offered purely because I think the site is already strong enough that a thoughtful refinement of the homepage could elevate it from being a very good corporate website to one that makes an even stronger first impression and converts more visitors into enquiries.

I hope that’s helpful, and congratulations on what is clearly a significant piece of work.

1 Like

Thank you so much for taking the time to look through the website and write such a detailed review. I really appreciate the time and effort you put into it.

Thank you as well for creating the two mock-ups. It was very kind of you to go the extra mile and visualize your ideas. Funny enough, I actually generated a very similar concept with an AI model myself at one point. :blush:

With this project I also had to stay quite close to the existing corporate identity, as it was a relaunch rather than a completely new brand. That naturally limited the visual direction in some areas.

May I ask one small favour? Would it be possible to remove the client’s name from your post and the mock-ups? The website is now live, and I’d prefer to avoid the client or the site being discoverable through the community or search engines.

Thanks again for all the time and thought you invested. I really appreciate it!

All client references removed.

@Steffi raised a really important point about the role of AI in web design, and I thought it was worth expanding on because I think there are still quite a few misconceptions about how AI is best used.

Personally, I don’t see AI as something that replaces the creative process. Quite the opposite - I see it as another tool in the designer’s toolbox, much like Photoshop, Illustrator or Sitely itself. The creativity still comes from the designer; AI simply helps explore ideas more quickly and visualise them before committing time to building them.

The biggest mistake many people make is asking AI something like, “Create me a website for a law firm.” The AI will certainly produce something, but the result is usually fairly generic because it hasn’t been given enough context to understand what you’re actually trying to achieve.

I’ve found that AI becomes dramatically more useful once you start teaching it about the project.

That teaching process doesn’t need to be complicated. In fact, it closely mirrors the kind of client brief many of us already create before starting a design. The difference is that, instead of the brief sitting in a folder, it becomes part of the conversation with the AI.

A good project blueprint might include things such as:

  • What the business actually does.

  • Who the target audience is.

  • What action you want visitors to take.

  • The personality the website should convey.

  • The company’s values and key messages.

  • The preferred colour palette and branding.

  • Competitor websites that the client likes (or dislikes).

  • The overall style you’re aiming for.

  • Any technical constraints or preferred platforms.

Once you’ve documented those things, you can upload that blueprint to the AI and use it as a constant point of reference throughout the design process (a source of truth document).

For example, rather than saying:

“Design me a legal services website.”

you might say:

“Using the attached project brief, create a homepage concept that reflects the company’s professional but approachable brand, follows the supplied colour palette, focuses on building trust with corporate decision-makers, encourages consultation enquiries, and is suitable for implementation in Sitely using its standard layout tools.”

That one prompt immediately gives the AI far more direction than a generic request ever could.

One tip that I’ve found particularly useful is to tell the AI which development platform you’re using - in this case, Sitely.

That may sound like a small detail, but it can make quite a difference. If the AI knows the design is intended for Sitely, it’s more likely to suggest layouts that can be achieved using Sitely’s existing features, rather than relying on complex interactions or effects that would require custom coding or be difficult to reproduce. Once the core layout is in place, you can always decide whether to enhance it with additional techniques later.

Another advantage is that AI isn’t limited to desktop concepts. Once you’re happy with a homepage layout, you can ask it to visualise how the same content should be arranged for tablets and mobile devices. That often highlights opportunities to simplify layouts, improve readability or rethink the order in which information is presented before you place a single object on the Sitely canvas.

What I particularly like is that this process doesn’t replace the designer - it gives the designer more options.

Instead of building three completely different homepage ideas from scratch, you can generate several well-considered concepts in a relatively short time, compare them against the original brief, discuss them with the client, refine the strongest ideas and then begin building with much greater confidence.

It’s very similar to the way architects produce concept drawings before construction begins. Nobody expects the first sketch to become the finished building, but those early visualisations are incredibly valuable because they allow ideas to be explored, challenged and refined while changes are still quick and inexpensive.

I think AI is beginning to play exactly the same role in web design.

For me, the real value isn’t that AI designs the website - it’s that it accelerates the journey from an idea to a well-thought-out design direction. The more clearly you define the objectives, the audience, the brand and the message, the more useful the AI becomes.

In other words, AI doesn’t replace good design thinking - it rewards it. The better you teach it about the project, the better it can assist you in bringing your own vision to life.

By way of example, I uploaded a client brief (more commonly referred to as a Software Development Blueprint - Websites are software). I also uploaded a colour pallet and used the example prompt above. This is the visualisation result for both the desktop and mobile versions of the site:

As can be seen, these layouts would be very simple to recreate in a Sitely project, with each clearly defined section of the page being its own layout block - this would make rearrangement for the mobile version incredibly simple. So, start using AI to assist you in the design process by having it create visual concepts based on a full development blueprint. It really can save you a lot of time.

Hi Stephie,

thanks again for taking the time to write such a detailed reply. I really appreciate the effort you put into it.

I completely agree that AI works much better when it has the right context. In my case, I also have to feed it the existing corporate identity and brand guidelines, because this is a relaunch rather than a completely new project. The challenge isn’t to invent a new visual direction, but to improve what’s already there while staying true to the client’s identity.

One of my main focuses on this project was actually SEO and GEO. The site is already performing very well in those areas, and a lot of the design and structural decisions were made with search visibility, technical quality and AI-readability in mind. So while the visual design is important, it was only one part of the overall project.

Thanks again for sharing your thoughts!

1 Like